[ QUOTE ]
... They then used statisticians to calculate the chances of this happening by chance.
The odds of it being chance are very high. Of course they are not nearly as high as the odds of random mutation leading to positive macro-evolution or of the bang bang creating the universe. Yet these things are taught as fact in our public schools.
[/ QUOTE ]
Statistics is a fine way to look at predictions and even an additional way to better understand things found in nature, but it is far removed from being able to give any truthful credibility to the claims they are making.
Statistically it has been said that there are billions of stars in the sky and a possible fraction of those could have planets orbiting them with atmospheres similar to ours and thus could possibly have developed simple, if not advanced, types of life upon them. However, to date there is still no concrete facts that life, in any form, exists beyond our own planet. Scientists believe that it is probable, but it still has not been proven. Likewise, they can guess and statistically try to give credence to these claims that they found Jesus' tomb, but they cannot prove it. Its a fun exercise in possibilities at best and more probably just another publicity stunt similar to all the documentaries that came out before and after "The DaVinci Code" was published. Just my thoughts on the subject.



Bookmarks